Essential Clauses in Stock Purchase Agreements: A Buyer and Seller Perspective
A stock purchase agreement (SPA) is one of the most critical documents in a mergers and acquisitions (M&A) transaction. It dictates the terms under which the buyer will acquire shares of the target company and allocates risks between the parties. While many provisions in an SPA are standard, several key clauses are heavily negotiated, often varying between market-standard, buyer-friendly, and seller-friendly versions. Below, we examine some of the most contested provisions in a stock purchase agreement and their typical variations, with specific examples of the provisions themselves.
1. Purchase Price Adjustments
Market Standard: Most SPAs include purchase price adjustments based on working capital, net debt, and cash levels at closing. A common clause reads: "The Purchase Price shall be adjusted post-closing based on the difference between the Estimated Net Working Capital and the Final Net Working Capital, as determined within 60 days of closing." Many agreements also include a working capital peg to reduce post-closing disputes.
A working capital peg is a benchmark level of working capital agreed upon by the buyer and seller, typically based on the target company's historical performance. It ensures that the company is delivered with an expected amount of working capital at closing. If the actual working capital at closing deviates from the peg, the purchase price is adjusted accordingly. This mechanism helps prevent disputes over routine fluctuations in working capital.
Buyer-Friendly: The buyer may seek a post-closing true-up period favoring downward revisions. A buyer-friendly provision may state: "If the Final Net Working Capital is lower than the Estimated Net Working Capital, the Seller shall refund the Buyer the shortfall within five business days." Buyers may also push for a broad net debt definition, including off-balance-sheet liabilities.
Seller-Friendly: The seller may push for minimal post-closing adjustments. A seller-friendly provision could read: "The Purchase Price shall be final upon closing, except in the event of a discrepancy exceeding $1,000,000 in the Net Working Capital adjustment." Sellers may also insist on a collar mechanism, preventing small fluctuations from triggering adjustments.
A collar mechanism is a safeguard that sets a range around the working capital peg, within which no purchase price adjustment is made. For example, if the agreed working capital peg is $10 million with a 5% collar, the purchase price will not be adjusted unless the closing working capital falls below $9.5 million or exceeds $10.5 million. This protects both parties from minor variations and reduces post-closing disputes.
2. Representations and Warranties
Market Standard: Both parties provide standard representations. A typical clause states: "The Seller represents that the Target’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Target."
Buyer-Friendly: The buyer may push for stricter representations. A buyer-friendly version might state: "The Seller represents and warrants that the financial statements are free from material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error, and that no undisclosed liabilities exist." Buyers often insist on a “bring-down” clause, reaffirming representations at closing.
Seller-Friendly: The seller may limit representations. A seller-friendly clause could read: "The Seller represents that, to the best of its knowledge, the financial statements are accurate, with no material misstatements." Sellers frequently include knowledge qualifiers and materiality qualifiers to narrow the scope.
3. Indemnification Provisions
Market Standard: Indemnification is often capped at a percentage of the purchase price. A common clause is: "The Seller shall indemnify the Buyer for breaches of representations and warranties, subject to an aggregate cap of 15% of the Purchase Price." Survival periods are typically 12-24 months for general reps and longer for fundamental reps (e.g., title, authority).
Buyer-Friendly: The buyer may seek broader indemnification. A buyer-favorable provision might state: "The Seller shall indemnify the Buyer for any and all losses arising from a breach of representations and warranties, with no cap on fundamental representations." Buyers also prefer higher caps, particularly in IP-heavy industries like technology.
Seller-Friendly: The seller may limit indemnification obligations. A seller-friendly clause could read: "The Seller shall indemnify the Buyer only for claims exceeding $500,000, with a total cap of 5% of the Purchase Price." Sellers often negotiate higher deductibles (baskets) before claims are paid and seek to avoid escrow holdbacks.
4. Closing Conditions
Market Standard: Closing conditions typically include regulatory approvals and MAC clauses. A standard clause is: "The obligations of the parties to consummate the transaction shall be subject to the receipt of all required governmental and third-party consents."
Buyer-Friendly: Buyers may insist on broad MAC clauses. A buyer-friendly MAC provision could state: "The Buyer may terminate this Agreement if any event occurs that has, or is reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Target’s business or financial condition." Buyers sometimes include termination rights for specific financial declines, such as a 20% EBITDA drop.
Seller-Friendly: Sellers prefer narrower MAC provisions. A seller-friendly version might state: "A material adverse effect shall not include changes in general economic conditions, industry-wide downturns, or force majeure events." Sellers may also negotiate reverse termination fees, requiring buyers to pay if they walk away.
5. Earnouts and Contingent Consideration
Market Standard: Earnouts tie part of the purchase price to performance. A typical clause states: "The Seller shall be entitled to an additional payment of up to $5,000,000, contingent upon the Target achieving EBITDA of $20,000,000 within two years of closing."
Buyer-Friendly: Buyers prefer strict earnout targets. A buyer-favorable provision may state: "Earnout payments shall be subject to the Target achieving an EBITDA margin of at least 25%, with the Buyer retaining sole discretion over operational decisions." Buyers often insist on strict financial hurdles and the right to adjust operations post-closing.
Seller-Friendly: Sellers want more certainty in earnout triggers. A seller-friendly provision could read: "Earnout payments shall be calculated based on gross revenue rather than EBITDA, with no restrictions on operational changes by the Seller." Sellers often push for protections against operational changes that could suppress earnings and independent arbitration for disputes.
Conclusion
Negotiating a stock purchase agreement requires careful balancing of risks and rewards. Understanding market standards while identifying buyer-friendly and seller-friendly variations of key provisions is essential for securing a favorable outcome. Whether you are a buyer or seller, working with experienced legal counsel can help tailor these provisions to best suit your strategic objectives.
Disclaimer
The content provided in this article is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. The information contained herein is general in nature and may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. No reader should act, or refrain from acting, based on this information without seeking professional legal counsel tailored to their specific circumstances.
No Attorney-Client Relationship
Viewing this blog, submitting inquiries, or engaging with its content does not establish an attorney-client relationship between you and Ebadat PLLC. The transmission of information via this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Any communication sent through this website may not be secure or confidential. If you require legal representation, please contact our firm directly to discuss your matter.
Not Legal Advertising or Solicitation
This blog complies with the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct and is not intended as advertising or solicitation. The presence of any case results, testimonials, or past outcomes does not guarantee or predict future results. Each legal matter is unique, and results depend on various factors specific to each case.
Jurisdiction & Licensing
Ebadat PLLC practices law in Texas and only provides legal services within jurisdictions where its attorneys are properly licensed. This blog is not intended to solicit clients outside of those jurisdictions.
For personalized legal advice, we encourage you to consult with a qualified attorney regarding your specific situation.
